Why is encapsulation sometimes preferred over removal of asbestos?

Encapsulation is often favored over the removal of asbestos primarily because it is less disruptive and can be less costly. This method involves applying a sealant to asbestos-containing materials to prevent fibers from becoming airborne. Instead of requiring a full disturbance of the structure, which can involve extensive demolition and reconstruction efforts, encapsulation allows for a safer maintenance strategy that keeps asbestos in place while managing its hazards.

The reduced disruption is significant for both occupants and the environment, as it minimizes the risks associated with the removal process, such as accidental release of fibers into the air. Economically, encapsulation often comes with lower labor and disposal costs compared to the extensive process of removing and safely disposing of asbestos materials. This makes it a more practical solution in many cases where the asbestos is in good condition and poses a minimal risk to health if left undisturbed.

Other options may imply advantages like thoroughness, regulatory requirements, or speed, but encapsulation stands out because it effectively balances safety, cost efficiency, and minimal disruption, making it a popular choice in managing asbestos materials when removal is not necessary.